ETH
Zürich
Autumn
Semester 2013
Behavioral-Environmental Economics and Policy
Elisabeth
Gsottbauer
CONTENT
Overviev
Goal
Meeting
time and location
Instructor
Format
Requirements
Literature
Overview:
The course
provides an overview of behavioral economics and its application to
environmentally relevant behaviors. It pays special attention to
behavioral-psychological evidence and discusses related experimental
laboratory
and field evidence for a variety of themes: cooperation and public
goods,
social motivation (non-monetary incentives, crowding-out), status and
conspicuous consumption, risk perception and prospect theory, fairness
preferences, heuristics and biases, framing, and impatience and
discounting.
The goal of
this course is to provide students with an understanding of the
relationship
between behavioral economics and environmental policy and address its
implication in areas like climate change, sustainable energy
consumption, and
biodiversity loss. This will involve discussing a number of
experimental
applications and insights.
Time:
Wednesday 13:15 – 14:00. First session: 18, September 2013.
Place:
ETH, Room IFW A34
Dr.
Elisabeth Gsottbauer
Institute
for Environmental Decisions (IED)
Chair
of Economics
CLD C10,
Clausiusstrasse 37
+41
44 632 5647 phone
Office hours: email elisabeth.gsottbauer@econ.gess.ethz.ch for an appointment.
Each week one
student needs to choose a paper from the growing
behavioral-environmental
economics literature and present it in class (“Presenter”).
In total we will
cover 12 research papers (see literature list). In addition, each
student needs
to discuss one of the presentations of their fellow course participants
(“Discussant”). The grade will be based on the presentation
(50%) and
discussion (50%).
a) a)
Presentation
Each
presentation needs to be around 25 minutes and should focus answering
the
following five questions:
b) Discussion
Discussants
are required to prepare 5 minutes of critical reflection of the
research paper
and presentation. On the one hand this should provide critical input on
the
given presentation of the student (content and structure), while on the
other
hand some positive/negative sides of the paper need to be pointed out.
The
discussion should be the basis of a general discussion and thus it is
recommended
preparing some questions for the audience. The discussant is expected
to lead
this discussion (15 minutes). In addition, discussants are required to
hand in
a 1 ½ page (11pt, Times New Roman, 1 ½ spaced) including
a short summary of the
paper and their own discussion and positive/negative critique. The
paper need
to be handed in on the same day of the corresponding session (via email
to the
Instructor).
Students need
a sound knowledge of environmental economics. Regular participation is
mandatory. The course is limited to 13 students. Papers and roles
(presenters
and discussants) will be assigned in the first session.
Nr. |
Date |
Research
Paper |
Presenter |
Discussant |
1 |
18.9 |
Introduction Part I |
|
|
2 |
25.9 |
Introduction Part II |
|
|
3 |
2.10 |
Milinski et al. (2008): The collective-risk social dilemma and the prevention of
simulated dangerous climate change |
|
|
4 |
9.10 |
Cardenas, J.C., Stranlund, J., and Willis, C. (2000): Local environmental control and institutional
crowding-out |
|
|
5 |
16.10 |
Ferraro, P., and Price, M. (2011): Using non-pecuniary strategies to influence
behavior: Evidence from a large scale field experiment |
|
|
6 |
23.10 |
Take part in an experiment! |
|
|
7 |
30.10 |
Araña, J., and Carmelo, J. (2012): Can defaults save the climate? Evidence from a
field experiment on carbon offsetting programs |
|
|
8 |
6.11 |
Griskevicius, V., van den Berg, B., and Tybur, J. (2010):
Going green to be seen: Status, reputation, and
conspicious conservation |
|
|
9 |
13.11 |
Narloch, U., Pascual, U., and Drucker, A. (2012) Collective action dynamics under external
rewards: Experimental insights from Andean farming communities |
|
|
10 |
20.11 |
Behavior and energy: Experiments that can inform energy
policy making |
Lecture: E. Gsottbauer |
- |
11 |
27.11 |
Petrolia, D., Landry C.E., and Coble, K.H (2013): Risk preferences, risk perceptions, and flood
insurance |
|
|
12 |
4.12 |
Tavoni A, Dannenberg A, Kallis G, and Löschel A.
(2011): Inequality, communication, and the avoidance of
disastrous climate change in a public goods game |
|
|
13 |
11.12 |
Linder, N., Uhl, G., Fliessbach, K, Trautner, P., Elger,
C., and Weber, B. (2010): Organic labeling influences food valuation and
choice |
|
|
14 |
18.12 |
Open discussion and reflection |
|
|